Hi, I have tried every thing including the kitchen sink but in vain. Has any one ever tested L3VPN on olive cause it is stated at http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive that "MPLS L3-VPN (seems to require "vrf-table-label" configured to actually pass traffic)". I used the vrf-table-label but then I could not even ping the loopback interface (which was in the VRF) from the remote PE.
Here is "show version" output of my olive instance: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show version Hostname: olive1 Model: olive JUNOS Base OS boot [7.3R2.7] JUNOS Base OS Software Suite [7.3R2.7] JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [7.3R2.7] JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Support (M20/M40) [7.3R2.7] JUNOS Routing Software Suite [7.3R2.7] JUNOS Online Documentation [7.3R2.7] JUNOS Crypto Software Suite [7.3R2.7] Regards, Junaid On Nov 7, 2007 2:59 AM, Gaston Tejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > in this case, given that the PE-CE link is fast-ethernet, try using the > vrf-table-label statement on the routing-instance. > > > BR > -- > *Cristian Gastón Tejia,* > > *Osinet Telecomunicaciones* > *http://www.osinet.com.ar/* > > > > Leonard Giuliano escribió: > > > This is expected. Forwarding unicast packets across L3VPNs doesn't work > > on olives, though as you can see, you should be able to get the control > > plane up. Interestingly, mcast forwarding will work if you want to try > > out MVPNs. > > > > Olives don't have a PFE, so some PFE stuff doesn't work. This is one > > example of something that doesn't work. > > > > > > -Lenny > > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Junaid wrote: > > > > -) Hi, > > -) > > -) I am testing MPLS L3VPNs on Olive. I have two directly connected PE > > -) routers (olive1 and olive2) and one CE router (olive3) connected to > > -) olive2. The PE routers share a /30 subnet on their connecting link > > -) (fxp0s on both routers connected via tap interfaces). The loopbacks of > > -) both the PE routers are statically routed on the other PE router (no > > -) IGP used for simplicity). I have created a VRF named "VPN" on both > > -) routers and put a one loopback interface each (other than the one use > > -) for the PE routers) in the VRF. Also, the interface connecting CE > > -) (olive3) to olive2 is also put in this VRF. Now, as indicated by > > -) routing tables, my control plane as well as my data plane information > > -) is as it should be, VPN routes are reaching from one PE to the other > > -) and forwarding table has the next-hop defined correctly. I am able to > > -) ping loopbacks in the VRFs from one PE to the other but I am unable to > > -) ping (from olive1) the interface IPs of the PE-CE link and the > > -) loopback of the CE router - the loopback of the CE router is > > -) statically routed (inside the VRF) on olive2. Can any one help me on > > -) this! > > -) > > -) A word about my olive environment; I have three olive instances on a > > -) Windows machine booted via "jqemu". All the instantiated interfaces > > -) are connected to "tap" interfaces on the host machine. All the tap > > -) interfaces are bridged together - so we can assume that all interfaces > > -) are connected on an L2 switch. I have also tested this situation by > > -) connecting instances using sockets but I got the same result. However, > > -) the all outputs below are based on the bridged version of the setup. > > -) > > -) Pertinent configs and outputs are as follows, I will really appreciate > > -) any help on this :) > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration > > -) version 7.0R1.5; > > -) system { > > -) host-name olive1; > > -) syslog { > > -) file logs { > > -) any any; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) interfaces { > > -) fxp0 { > > -) unit 0 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 10.0.0.1/24; > > -) } > > -) family mpls; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) lo0 { > > -) unit 0 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 10.10.0.1/32; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) unit 1 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 192.168.1.254/32; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) routing-options { > > -) static { > > -) route 10.10.0.2/32 next-hop 10.0.0.2; > > -) } > > -) router-id 10.10.0.1; > > -) autonomous-system 64512; > > -) } > > -) protocols { > > -) rsvp { > > -) traceoptions { > > -) file rsvp-logs world-readable; > > -) flag all; > > -) } > > -) interface fxp0.0; > > -) interface all; > > -) } > > -) mpls { > > -) label-switched-path testp { > > -) from 10.0.0.1; > > -) to 10.0.0.2; > > -) no-cspf; > > -) } > > -) interface fxp0.0; > > -) } > > -) bgp { > > -) group o1to2 { > > -) type internal; > > -) neighbor 10.0.0.2 { > > -) family inet-vpn { > > -) unicast; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) routing-instances { > > -) VPN { > > -) instance-type vrf; > > -) interface lo0.1; > > -) route-distinguisher 64512:1; > > -) vrf-target target:64512:100; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration > > -) version 7.0R1.5; > > -) system { > > -) host-name olive2; > > -) } > > -) interfaces { > > -) fxp0 { > > -) unit 0 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 10.0.0.2/24; > > -) } > > -) family mpls; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) fxp1 { > > -) unit 0 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 10.1.0.1/24; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) lo0 { > > -) unit 0 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 10.10.0.2/32; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) unit 2 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 192.168.2.254/32; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) routing-options { > > -) static { > > -) route 10.10.0.1/32 next-hop 10.0.0.1; > > -) } > > -) router-id 10.10.0.2; > > -) autonomous-system 64512; > > -) } > > -) protocols { > > -) rsvp { > > -) interface fxp0.0; > > -) interface all; > > -) } > > -) mpls { > > -) label-switched-path testp { > > -) from 10.0.0.2; > > -) to 10.0.0.1; > > -) no-cspf; > > -) } > > -) interface fxp0.0; > > -) } > > -) bgp { > > -) group o1to2 { > > -) type internal; > > -) neighbor 10.0.0.1 { > > -) family inet-vpn { > > -) unicast; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) routing-instances { > > -) VPN { > > -) instance-type vrf; > > -) interface lo0.2; > > -) interface fxp1.0; > > -) route-distinguisher 64512:2; > > -) vrf-target target:64512:100; > > -) routing-options { > > -) static { > > -) route 172.16.10.254/32 next-hop 10.1.0.2; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show configuration > > -) version 7.0R1.5; > > -) system { > > -) host-name olive3; > > -) } > > -) interfaces { > > -) fxp0 { > > -) unit 0 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 10.1.0.2/24; > > -) } > > -) family mpls; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) lo0 { > > -) unit 0 { > > -) family inet { > > -) address 172.16.10.254/32; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) } > > -) routing-options { > > -) static { > > -) route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 10.1.0.1; > > -) } > > -) } > > -) > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show route > > -) > > -) inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 10.0.0.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:12:57 > > -) > via fxp0.0 > > -) 10.0.0.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:12:57 > > -) Local via fxp0.0 > > -) 10.10.0.1/32 *[Direct/0] 00:12:57 > > -) > via lo0.0 > > -) 10.10.0.2/32 *[Static/5] 00:12:55 > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0 > > -) > > -) inet.3: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 10.0.0.2/32 *[RSVP/7] 00:12:44, metric 65535 > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) > > -) VPN.inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 10.1.0.0/24 *[BGP/170] 00:12:37, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) 172.16.10.254/32 *[BGP/170] 00:12:37, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) 192.168.1.254/32 *[Direct/0] 00:12:55 > > -) > via lo0.1 > > -) 192.168.2.254/32 *[BGP/170] 00:12:37, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) > > -) mpls.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 0 *[MPLS/0] 00:13:03, metric 1 > > -) Receive > > -) 1 *[MPLS/0] 00:13:03, metric 1 > > -) Receive > > -) 2 *[MPLS/0] 00:13:03, metric 1 > > -) Receive > > -) 100000 *[VPN/170] 00:12:37 > > -) receive table VPN.inet.0, Pop > > -) > > -) bgp.l3vpn.0: 3 destinations, 3 routes (3 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 64512:2:10.1.0.0/24 > > -) *[BGP/170] 00:12:37, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) 64512:2:172.16.10.254/32 > > -) *[BGP/170] 00:12:37, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) 64512:2:192.168.2.254/32 > > -) *[BGP/170] 00:12:37, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.2 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) > > -) __juniper_private1__.inet6.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 > > holddown, 0 > > -) hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) fe80::2aa:ff:fe00:101/128 > > -) *[Direct/0] 00:12:55 > > -) > via lo0.16385 > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show route > > -) > > -) inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 10.0.0.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:13:52 > > -) > via fxp0.0 > > -) 10.0.0.2/32 *[Local/0] 00:13:52 > > -) Local via fxp0.0 > > -) 10.10.0.1/32 *[Static/5] 00:13:51 > > -) > to 10.0.0.1 via fxp0.0 > > -) 10.10.0.2/32 *[Direct/0] 00:13:52 > > -) > via lo0.0 > > -) > > -) inet.3: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 10.0.0.1/32 *[RSVP/7] 00:13:48, metric 65535 > > -) > to 10.0.0.1 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) > > -) VPN.inet.0: 5 destinations, 5 routes (5 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 10.1.0.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:13:53 > > -) > via fxp1.0 > > -) 10.1.0.1/32 *[Local/0] 00:13:53 > > -) Local via fxp1.0 > > -) 172.16.10.254/32 *[Static/5] 00:13:52 > > -) > to 10.1.0.2 via fxp1.0 > > -) 192.168.1.254/32 *[BGP/170] 00:13:42, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.1 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) 192.168.2.254/32 *[Direct/0] 00:13:53 > > -) > via lo0.2 > > -) > > -) mpls.0: 5 destinations, 5 routes (5 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 0 *[MPLS/0] 00:13:56, metric 1 > > -) Receive > > -) 1 *[MPLS/0] 00:13:56, metric 1 > > -) Receive > > -) 2 *[MPLS/0] 00:13:56, metric 1 > > -) Receive > > -) 100000 *[VPN/170] 00:13:43 > > -) > to 10.1.0.2 via fxp1.0, Pop > > -) 100016 *[VPN/170] 00:13:43 > > -) receive table VPN.inet.0, Pop > > -) > > -) bgp.l3vpn.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 64512:1:192.168.1.254/32 > > -) *[BGP/170] 00:13:42, localpref 100 > > -) AS path: I > > -) > to 10.0.0.1 via fxp0.0, label-switched-path testp > > -) > > -) __juniper_private1__.inet6.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 > > holddown, 0 > > -) hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) fe80::2aa:ff:fe00:103/128 > > -) *[Direct/0] 00:13:52 > > -) > via lo0.16385 > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show route > > -) > > -) inet.0: 4 destinations, 4 routes (4 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) 0.0.0.0/0 *[Static/5] 00:06:47 > > -) > to 10.1.0.1 via fxp0.0 > > -) 10.1.0.0/24 *[Direct/0] 00:06:49 > > -) > via fxp0.0 > > -) 10.1.0.2/32 *[Local/0] 00:06:49 > > -) Local via fxp0.0 > > -) 172.16.10.254/32 *[Direct/0] 00:06:48 > > -) > via lo0.0 > > -) > > -) __juniper_private1__.inet6.0: 1 destinations, 1 routes (1 active, 0 > > holddown, 0 > > -) hidden) > > -) + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > -) > > -) fe80::2aa:ff:fe00:105/128 > > -) *[Direct/0] 00:06:48 > > -) > via lo0.16385 > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) >From olive1 I am able to ping 192.168.2.254 which is the loopback on > > -) olive2 in the VRF: > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 192.168.2.254 > > -) PING 192.168.2.254 (192.168.2.254): 56 data bytes > > -) ping: sendto: No route to host > > -) > > -) ^C > > -) --- 192.168.2.254 ping statistics --- > > -) 1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 192.168.2.254 routing-instance VPN > > -) PING 192.168.2.254 (192.168.2.254): 56 data bytes > > -) 64 bytes from 192.168.2.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=142.953 ms > > -) 64 bytes from 192.168.2.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=1.657 ms > > -) 64 bytes from 192.168.2.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4.885 ms > > -) > > -) ^C > > -) --- 192.168.2.254 ping statistics --- > > -) 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss > > -) round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.657/49.832/142.953/65.860 ms > > -) > > -) Similarly I can ping the loopback in VRF on olive1 from olive2 (output > > -) not shown). > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) Also, I am unable to ping the interface IPs on the link shared by > > -) olive2 and CE router from olive1. > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 10.1.0.1 routing-instance VPN > > -) PING 10.1.0.1 (10.1.0.1): 56 data bytes > > -) ^C > > -) --- 10.1.0.1 ping statistics --- > > -) 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 10.1.0.2 routing-instance VPN > > -) PING 10.1.0.2 (10.1.0.2): 56 data bytes > > -) ^C > > -) --- 10.1.0.2 ping statistics --- > > -) 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) However, I am unable to ping the loopback on CE from olive1 while I > > -) can ping it from Olive2: > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 172.16.10.254 routing-instance VPN > > -) PING 172.16.10.254 (172.16.10.254): 56 data bytes > > -) ^C > > -) --- 172.16.10.254 ping statistics --- > > -) 7 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > -) > > -) > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 172.16.10.254 routing-instance VPN > > -) PING 172.16.10.254 (172.16.10.254): 56 data bytes > > -) 64 bytes from 172.16.10.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=47.467 ms > > -) 64 bytes from 172.16.10.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=3.266 ms > > -) 64 bytes from 172.16.10.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4.939 ms > > -) 64 bytes from 172.16.10.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=3.078 ms > > -) > > -) ^C > > -) --- 172.16.10.254 ping statistics --- > > -) 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss > > -) round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 3.078/14.688/47.467/18.939 ms > > -) > > -) > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) Sniffing on the CORE interface on olive2 while pinging the loopback on > > -) CE from olive1 shows that ICMP (MPLS) packets are received from olive1 > > -) with the correct VPN label but strangely olive2 routers seems to DROP > > -) THEM SILENTLY. I have sniffed on CE but no packet is received on its > > -) interface! > > -) > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> monitor traffic interface fxp0 extensive > > -) Listening on fxp0, capture size 96 bytes > > -) > > -) 14:52:12.818208 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29970, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 14080, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:13.253471 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29971, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 14336, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:13.680046 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29972, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 14592, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:14.115719 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29973, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 14848, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:14.549708 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29974, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 15104, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:14.984292 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29975, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 15360, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:15.419728 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29976, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 15616, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:15.849263 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29977, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 15872, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:16.288540 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29978, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 16128, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:16.718826 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29979, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 16384, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:17.434696 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29980, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 16640, length 64 > > -) > > -) 14:52:17.616305 Out 0:aa:0:0:1:3 0:aa:0:0:1:1 ip 85: (tos 0xc0, ttl > > -) 64, id 18716, offset 0, flags [none], proto: TCP (6), length: 71) > > -) 10.0.0.2.4944 > 10.0.0.1.bgp: P 92357182:92357201(19) ack 3673416124 > > -) win 16486 <nop,nop > > -) ,timestamp 249499 252521>: BGP, length: 19 > > -) Keepalive Message (4), length: 19 > > -) > > -) 14:52:17.659058 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 ip 66: (tos 0xc0, ttl > > -) 64, id 29981, offset 0, flags [none], proto: TCP (6), length: 52) > > -) 10.0.0.1.bgp > 10.0.0.2.4944: . 1:1(0) ack 19 win 16384 > > -) <nop,nop,timestamp 256336 24949 > > -) 9> > > -) > > -) 14:52:17.864884 In 0:aa:0:0:1:1 0:aa:0:0:1:3 8847 102: MPLS (label > > -) 100000, exp 0, [S], ttl 255) > > -) (tos 0x0, ttl 255, id 29982, offset 0, flags [none], proto: > > -) ICMP (1), length: 84) 192.168.1.254 > 172.16.10.254: ICMP echo request > > -) seq 16896, length 64 > > -) > > -) ^C > > -) 20 packets received by filter > > -) 0 packets dropped by kernel > > -) > > -) [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -) > > -) ----------------------------------------- > > -) > > -) > > -) Regards, > > -) > > -) JunaidM > > -) _______________________________________________ > > -) juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > -) https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > -) > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > -- > -- > *Cristian Gastón Tejia,* > > *Osinet Telecomunicaciones* > Lavalleja 637 > C1414DTM Capital Federal - Buenos Aires > Tel.: 54.11.4856.0365 > Cel.: 54.9.11.6047.4554 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.osinet.com.ar* > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
