On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:39:23AM -0800, Hamid Ahmed wrote: > 2) You are giving the explanation for equal cost paths. However in > my case there are two unequal cost paths. So my question still how > can u do that in using unequal cost paths ?
> 3) Please explain when u say the following: > "What you will need to do is create 2 different RSVP Signaled LSPs > towards the router which you want to "add more traffic", then you need to > export these 2 LSPs in OSPF (not turn OSPF off!) so that the routing protocol > can see and use these 2 new paths. In the end, you will have 2 equals paths > going in 1 direction, and a > single path in the other. If you need to move more traffic, then simply add > a 3rd, 4th, etc LSP." > 4) The above discussion is for when we are doing work within MPLS. > Now in my case my intended traffic (Voice) does not use > MPLS(however MPLS is enabled but for some other traffic like > sigtran and O/M). OSPF is there as IGP and i need to load balance > my intended traffic using the unequal cost path. I have an idea > taht i create 2 x static GRE tunnels from one end to the other. My > question can GRE tunnel override OSPF as that would be purely > static routing and whatever goes with the tunnels would be just > IP-payload. He is saying to expand your use of MPLS to provide the solution to your un-equal multipath situation. You would be using MPLS "tunnels" a.k.a. LSPs to provide the solution. I suppose GRE tunnels could work too, but since you already have MPLS set up, you might as well expand your use of it to cover this case as well. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
