Hi Ibrahim, Could you tell me if that solved the problem of using same link twice or more for same flow, when PE1 to PEy goes over same link than PE1 to PEx and both PEx and PEy has multicast users?
tks, Alaerte On 12/2/07, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe it's draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-mcast-01. > > We are already running P2MP LSP (template-based) for VPLS multicast > delivery. We're on 8.3. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of alaerte vidali > Sent: Friday, 30 November, 2007 2:14 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Multicast over VPLS > > Hi, > > Any news about what draft Juniper is considering implement to avoid > waste > bandwidth when sending multicast over VPLS in ring topology? > > tks, > Alaerte > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
