Hi, I believe you will face scalability issues, even though I can only affirm this 100% in Cisco.
I suggest you consider not only normal periods of the network. In this case probably it is ok. But add to this all process you have, plus things like instabilities in network (STP issues, link flapping...). Then everything together can result in routers losing track of VRRP neighbor packets due to the large number. Br, Alaerte > > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. VRRP tuning and scaling (Gard Undheim) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 18:15:58 +0100 > From: Gard Undheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [j-nsp] VRRP tuning and scaling > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > Hi > > I am currently tuning VRRP to speed up the failover time. I have set the > fast-interval to 100msec, which is a minimum. Does anyone know how these > settings scale with different numbers of vrrp groups? The customer > currently has 20 vrrp groups, but would it also work fine with as much > as 255 groups and fast interval of 100msec? > > > Thanks for any help! > > Best Regards, > Gard > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
