Hi, With the advice of everyone and the following link I have managed to get the Lacp working by removing tagged ports.
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/foundry/2825?search_string=lacp%20juniper;#2825 Thanks a million, Brendan On 6/11/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Juniper - Foundry Link aggregation (Gareth Campling) > 2. Re: Changing a route based on latency (Alex) > 3. 3rd party DWDM SFPs (Chuck Anderson) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:20:48 +0100 > From: "Gareth Campling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper - Foundry Link aggregation > To: "Brendan Regan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Message-ID: > < > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Here is sample config from one of our sites running Juniper M10i and a > Foundry RX with a 2 port aggregation > > == Juniper M10i == > > ge-1/0/0 { > description "1GB to Port 3/7"; > gigether-options { > 802.3ad ae0; > } > } > ge-1/1/0 { > description "1GB to Port 2/7"; > gigether-options { > 802.3ad ae0; > } > } > > ae0 { > description "2GB Trunk"; > vlan-tagging; > mtu 9192; > aggregated-ether-options { > lacp { > active; > } > } > > > Physical interface: ae0, Enabled, Physical link is Up > Interface index: 128, SNMP ifIndex: 34 > Link-level type: Ethernet, MTU: 9192, Speed: 2000mbps, Loopback: > Disabled, Source filtering: Disabled, Flow control: Disabled, > Minimum links needed: 1, Minimum bandwidth needed: 0 > Device flags : Present Running > > > == Foundry RX == > > interface ethernet 3/7 > link-aggregate passive > > interface ethernet 2/7 > link-aggregate passive > > #show link-aggregate > Long timeout: 90, default: 90 > Short timeout: 3, default: 3 > Port [Sys P] [Port P] [ Key ] > [Act][Tio][Agg][Syn][Col][Dis][Def][Exp][Ope] > 2/7 1 1 2 No L Agg Syn Col Dis No No > Ope > 3/7 1 1 2 No L Agg Syn Col Dis No No > Ope > > HTH > > Gareth Campling > Senior Network Engineer > Griffin Internet > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brendan Regan > Sent: 10 June 2008 18:16 > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper - Foundry Link aggregation > > Hi, > I was wondering if anyone had managed to setup 802.3ad link aggregation > between a foundry fesx and a juniper m5. > > I have followed the outlines of both vendors on how this should be > setup. > The ports on the Juniper are active and the foundry passive and the > ports on > the foundry show up as blocked state. > > If anyone has a working config setup I am wondering if they could e-mail > me > a sample of this. > > Thanks, > Brendan > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:45:22 +0100 > From: "Alex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Changing a route based on latency > To: "Junaid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "juniper-nsp" > <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Junaid, > You don't need a server for ICMP Echo Replies and ICMP Timestamp Replies. > Make sure these packets are not blocked by firewall though. > You only need a server for TCP/UDP and HTTP probe replies (unless you > enable > JWeb on the remote router, in this case you don't need a server for HTTP > either). > Rgds > Alex > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Junaid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "juniper-nsp" <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 10:07 AM > Subject: [j-nsp] Changing a route based on latency > > > > Hi, > > > > I was going through the documentation for RPM (Real-time Performance > > Monitor) and as I suspected, we need a server (Juniper router) at the > > other end to send us responses. Is there a feature/solution that does > > not require any config on the remote end; like we can send ICMP echos > > and based on the response we can take some action. > > > > What I need is a mechanism to change my uplink from my primary service > > provider to my secondary service provider based on the delay/latency I > > am experiencing on the primary link. Any suggestion? > > > > > > Regards, > > Junaid > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:55:43 -0400 > From: Chuck Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [j-nsp] 3rd party DWDM SFPs > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Does anyone have any experience, good or bad, with using 3rd party > DWDM SFPs in M120 or M10i Gigabit Ethernet PICs? Specifically, I'm > looking at using these SFPs: > > Finisar FWLF1631xx 2.67 Gigabit RoHS Compliant DWDM SFP with APD > Receiver: > > > http://www.finisar.com/product-124-2.67_Gigabit_RoHS_Compliant_DWDM_SFP_with_APD_Receiver_(FWLF1631xx) > > > With two each of the above in these PICs: > > M120: PC-8GE-TYPE3-SFP-IQ2 > M10i: PE-4GE-TYPE1-SFP-IQ2 > > Thanks. > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list > juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 67, Issue 15 > ******************************************* > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp