Cisco sent us one of these "neutral, unbiased comparisons a few years ago when we were evaluating routers. The other guy looked very bad until we realized that the other guy was configured to do RED and the Cisco was doing tail-drop.
Cisco responded with an "Oops. We'll take that paper off of our web pages. Very sorry about the bogus information, but it was all the fault of the company that we hired to do the testing." It might have been since Cisco defaults to tail-drop and the other vendor defaults to RED. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 09:57:09 -0500 > From: "Boyd, Benjamin R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I'd really like to see a 10k with 61,500 oE/oA conns, maybe then we'd > have more of them. :) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Masood Ahmad > Shah > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 1:10 PM > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [j-nsp] Is this true > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps133/prod_system_test_re > port > 0900aecd801b9424.html > > :) >
pgp2mqVVovblH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
