I've had an issue such as this between foundry and cisco hardware
where link is up and it appears to negotiate but there is no
connectivity. Have you tried disabling negotiation on both sides ?
set gigether-options no-auto-negotiation
On Jun 27, 2008, at 1:12 PM, James Jun wrote:
Hey ras, thanks for your reply :)
The show route commands look pretty normal to me (I've pasted output
below),
the direct/local routes pertinent to the 10.10.255.192/30 subnet are
there.
I was running JUNOS 9.0R2 earlier when I first posted this message,
but
upgraded it just now to 9.1R1.8. Unfortunately the problem
persists :-(
FWIW, on the Cisco side, I have it connected to a GLC-T SFP (for
copper
gig-e). Thinking that it may be a bad sfp or line card at Cisco
side, I
configured a 2nd interface (ge-0/0/2.0 on the EX) headed out to a
different,
second Cat6500 unit. But it's exhibiting exact same problem on that
2nd
interface as well (routes installed, link is up/up, negotiated as
1000BaseT
but unable to ping across; getting sendto: Network is down message
at EX
end).
In the meantime, I'm going to go ahead and open a JTAC case and also
try
setting it up as a layer-2 access port with an L3 vlan on top of it
to see
if it does anything different..
Thanks,
james
--- JUNOS 9.1R1.8 built 2008-04-25 07:40:32 UTC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show route 10.10.255.193/32 extensive
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show route 10.10.255.192/30 extensive
inet.0: 11 destinations, 11 routes (11 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
10.10.255.192/30 (1 entry, 0 announced)
*Direct Preference: 0
Next hop type: Interface
Next-hop reference count: 1
Next hop: via ge-0/0/0.0, selected
State: <Active Int>
Local AS: 25623
Age: 12:07
Task: IF
AS path: I
10.10.255.194/32 (1 entry, 0 announced)
*Local Preference: 0
Next hop type: Local
Next-hop reference count: 6
Interface: ge-0/0/0.0
State: <Active NoReadvrt Int>
Local AS: 25623
Age: 12:07
Task: IF
AS path: I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show arp | match 10.10.255.193
00:15:c7:22:1b:80 10.10.255.193 10.10.255.193
ge-0/0/0.0 none
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 10.10.255.193
PING 10.10.255.193 (10.10.255.193): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is down
^C
--- 10.10.255.193 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> start shell
% netstat -ran -f inet | grep 10.10.255.19
10.10.255.192/30 intf 0 rslv 516 1
ge-0/0/0.0
10.10.255.192/32 dest 0 10.10.255.192 recv 514 1
ge-0/0/0.0
10.10.255.193/32 dest 0 0:15:c7:22:1b:80 ucst 550 1
ge-0/0/0.0
10.10.255.194/32 intf 0 10.10.255.194 locl 515 2
10.10.255.194/32 dest 0 10.10.255.194 locl 515 2
10.10.255.195/32 dest 0 10.10.255.195 bcst 513 1
ge-0/0/0.0
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:37 PM
To: James Jun
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Interface without 'family ethernet-switching'
possible on EX series?
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:26:04PM -0400, James Jun wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ping 10.10.255.193
PING 10.10.255.193 (10.10.255.193): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is down
ping: sendto: Network is down
ping: sendto: Network is down
ping: sendto: Network is down
ping: sendto: Network is down
^C
--- 10.10.255.193 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
show route 10.10.255.193 extensive and 192/30 extensive, make sure
your
local and direct routes are getting installed properly. I've seen
some
bugs related to this on EX. Also what code are you running? If
9.0R2, try
9.1R1 instead.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA
F8B1 2CBC)
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
