It works. Thanks.
Can you please elaborate a bit more  what do you mean by local mesh-groups?
I tried to forward learned traffic as well as flooded from interfaces
between local sites and interfaces within local sites...traffic was flowing
in any case.
Are those mesh groups supposed to supress some traffic? Not quite sure what
is the purpose of multiple local sites? If I have many interfaces in a
single site, wouldn't that work as well?
Thanks,
marlon


On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Krasimir Avramski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Only one pseudowire is setup between PEs of a VPLS domain.
>
> There are already pseudowires 1-2 and 1-3, so site ID 1 is minimum
> designated in PE for this VPLS domain. At the forwarding plain you should
> not have any problems in communication between interfaces in site 4 to
> local
> interfaces in site 1 and remote site IDs 2 and 3.
> LM, RM states are not considered errors, that is more information for the
> pseudowire selection.
>
> Think of "a site" (VE) as a selection of PE-CE interfaces (local
> mesh-group)
> for a vpls domain.
>
> Also when configuring multihoming specify the site preferences in order PEs
> to solve collisions and choose single forwarder.
>
>
> Regards,
> Krasi
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon Duksa
> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 1:16 AM
> > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [j-nsp] VPLS LM Status?
> >
> > Does anyone know why would I get the LM status (local site ID not minimum
> > designated) on my VPLS connection.
> > I have two sites configured on a single PE in the same VPLS.
> > One site is coming up just fine, but the other is not.
> >
> > The remote side for the 'not up' connection is complaining with the RM
> > status (remote site ID not minimum designated).
> >
> > What does this 'ID not minimun designated' mean?
> > My sites ID are unique withing the VPLS and within the range that is
> > defined
> > for the site-range.
> >
> > This is the config on my local router:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] show routing-instances
> > vpls {
> >     instance-type vpls;
> >     interface ge-0/1/1.0;
> >     interface ge-8/2/0.0;
> >     interface ge-5/3/4.0;
> >     route-distinguisher 100:100;
> >     vrf-target target:200:200;
> >     protocols {
> >         vpls {
> >             site-range 10;
> >             no-tunnel-services;
> >             site green {
> >                 site-identifier 1;
> >                 interface ge-0/1/1.0;
> >                 interface ge-8/2/0.0;
> >             }
> >             site multi {
> >                 site-identifier 4;
> >                 interface ge-5/3/4.0;
> >             }
> >         }
> >     }
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > And this is the status:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] run show vpls connections
> > Layer-2 VPN connections:
> >
> > Legend for connection status (St)
> > EI -- encapsulation invalid      NC -- interface encapsulation not
> > CCC/TCC/VPLS
> > EM -- encapsulation mismatch     WE -- interface and instance encaps not
> > same
> > VC-Dn -- Virtual circuit down    NP -- interface hardware not present
> > CM -- control-word mismatch      -> -- only outbound connection is up
> > CN -- circuit not provisioned    <- -- only inbound connection is up
> > OR -- out of range               Up -- operational
> > OL -- no outgoing label          Dn -- down
> > LD -- local site signaled down   CF -- call admission control failure
> > RD -- remote site signaled down  SC -- local and remote site ID collision
> > LN -- local site not designated  LM -- local site ID not minimum
> > designated
> > RN -- remote site not designated RM -- remote site ID not minimum
> > designated
> > XX -- unknown connection status  IL -- no incoming label
> > MM -- MTU mismatch               MI -- Mesh-Group ID not availble
> >
> > Legend for interface status
> > Up -- operational
> > Dn -- down
> >
> > Instance: vpls
> >   Local site: green (1)
> >     connection-site           Type  St     Time last up          # Up
> > trans
> >     2                         rmt   Up     Aug  3 22:02:16 2008
> > 1
> >       Local interface: lsi.1048578, Status: Up, Encapsulation: VPLS
> >         Description: Intf - vpls vpls local site 1 remote site 2
> >       Remote PE: 2.2.2.2, Negotiated control-word: No
> >       Incoming label: 262154, Outgoing label: 800032
> >     3                         rmt   Up     Aug  3 22:02:16 2008
> > 1
> >       Local interface: lsi.1048576, Status: Up, Encapsulation: VPLS
> >         Description: Intf - vpls vpls local site 1 remote site 3
> >       Remote PE: 3.3.3.3, Negotiated control-word: No
> >       Incoming label: 262155, Outgoing label: 800024
> >   Local site: multi (4)
> >     connection-site           Type  St     Time last up          # Up
> > trans
> >     2                         rmt   LM
> >     3                         rmt   LM
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marlon
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to