Marlon Duksa wrote:
Thanks Sean! Please see in-line:
> Don't do it on the RE, unless you want problems.
Marlon: But would this be an option if I wanted to? It seems to me
that this is not even an option.
only for GRE or IP-IP for instance ... but don't do it .. you may screw
up your protocols.
I also remember running VPLS without it (no-tunneling-service
command). Why
do I need this tunneling mode than on MX?
You don't - you can also run in no-tunnel mode
Marlon: That's exactly my point. Why don't I need it? What benefit do
I get if I use it vs not? If I don't need it for VPLS, then maybe I
don't need it for bunch of other stuff? Where is the delineation?
Thanks again.
Marlon
what other stuff ? You need it for NG-multicast , draft-rosen, some
multicast functionality as explained before .... but "most" features do
not need a tunnel PIC.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
