Thanks, that's great. They're not running RIP or OSPF to customers. The only other thing is that I'm not sure about is whether to point the static route to the ISP router's HSRP address or their individual addresses?
-----Original Message----- From: Derick Winkworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 31 October 2008 11:03 PM To: Campbell, Alex Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP multihop question That is the correct approach, unless they are also running RIP or OSPF inbetween... Which I doubt. But hey... you never know. Campbell, Alex wrote: > Hi all, > > We are in the process of bringing up an additional upstream provider to > our J4350s. They have given us two switchports on a /29, and told us to > establish multihop BGP sessions to their routers (which are on a > completely different subnet). Each switchport will come back to a > different J4350 on our end. > > My problem is that I don't get how our routers will know where to send > the BGP packets to the ISPs routers, as they won't have a route for them > (we are running defaultless). > > I think I need to add a static route out to their BGP routers - is this > the correct approach here? Or am I missing something? > > Any help would be most appreciated. > > Regards, > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.5/1756 - Release Date: 10/30/2008 7:59 AM > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
