but in 2 different terms !!!
not in same term !?
I was asking about same term ?!
Thanks
________________________________
From: Masood Ahmad Shah <mas...@nexlinx.net.pk>
To: Ahmad Alhady <ahmad.alh...@yahoo.com>; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 8:14:11 PM
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy
The following configuration should work for IPv6/IPv4 in same policy.
policy-statement O-R {
term 1 {
from {
protocol ospf;
route-filter fec0:0:0:4::/64 orlonger;
}
then accept;
}
term 2 {
from {
protocol ospf;
route-filter 10.0.6.0/24 orlonger;
}
then accept;
}
Regards,
Masood
-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmad Alhady
Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 9:52 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy
can we merge matching IPv6 and IPv4 routes in same config ???
for example
policy-statement O-R {
term 1 {
from {
protocol ospf;
route-filter 10.0.6.0/24 orlonger;
route-filter fec0:0:0:4::/64 orlonger;
}
then accept;
}
he is giving me this message!!!!!
Policy: invalid prefix fec0:0:0:4::/64 for family inet
error: configuration check-out failed
Ahmad
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
