> > Perhaps they have decided that any SFP NOT from them will no longer > > be allowed to work due to it not having a magic number in its > > memory stored on the SFP. > That was my concern. I believe I will get a Juniper branded 1000baseT > SFP and try the 9.4 upgrade again. I was surprised that a Cisco brand > 10GBASE-LR XFP continued to work while all my generic SFP-Ts failed to > establish any link. > > I had hoped one of the Juniper list readers might comment on this.
We have plenty of boxes with non-Juniper branded 1000T SFPs, and have never had problems. But then we've never tried 9.4 yet. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
