Silly me. Yes of course, if the route points to fxp0, the route will be used for forwarding, but no packets can transit from the PFE there. But Felix, are you sure packets go in the other direction? How does the connection between PFE and RE handle this?
Patrik > It'll try to use it, but it shouldn't work for actual forwarding - you > can't get packets from the PFE towards fxp0 (but be warned: you can get > packets from fxp0 to the PFE...). > > Kind regards, > > Felix > > > Patrik Olsson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> sorry for typing faster than thinking :-) >> >> If you see the route in inet.0, it will be used for forwarding in the >> global instance. >> >> Does that solve your issue? >> >> Cheers >> Patrik >> >> Bit Gossip wrote: >>> Experts, >>> is the default route generated by the following config used for general >>> forwarding? I see that it is installed in inet.0. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> bit. >>> >>> groups { >>> re0 { >>> interfaces { >>> fxp0 { >>> unit 0 { >>> family inet { >>> address 1.1.1.2/8; >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> routing-options { >>> static { >>> route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 1.1.1.1; >>> } >>> } >>> } >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > -- //Patrik Webkom http://www.webkom.se +46 (0)709 35 22 99 +46 (0)8 559 26 488 _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp