thanks for your help
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Junaid <junaid....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > If you are assigning IP addresses from local-pool, you dont need any > change on the RADIUS server. However, you will need to have a PPP > dialer that understands IPv6. Although, v6 address is not assigned by > PPP but IPV6CP negotiates each node's Interface Identifier. Windows > Vista's PPP dialer supports v6, as well as the PPP dialer shipped with > Linux. > > Junaid > > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:44 PM, fighter worker <knowhowc...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Dear all >> >> >> >> iam trying to implement IPV6 over PPPOE and i need to know if there is any >> modification to the PPPOE protocol as i know PPPOE is responsible only for >> simulating p2p over ethernet and to provide authentication model over >> ethernet >> and as far i know that PPP was modified to support IPv6 encapsulation, also >> iam using a radius server for authentication and dont send any ip related >> parameters in the radius replay as my BRAS is using pools for assiging IP for >> each PPP session so do i need to make this radius support IPV6 also or the >> normal radius server will work >> >> >> >> appreciate your help >> >> Regards >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
