On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 07:57:10AM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, michael.fi...@bt.com <michael.fi...@bt.com> said: > > Isn't that what the JunOS EEOL (extended end of life) releases > > should be (or more probably could be)? > > > > Juniper already have these releases they guarantee to support for 3 years. > > > > All (!?) they would need to do is to release more 'R' releases of those > > versions than they currently do, rolling all bug fixes that are going > > into new releases into the EEOL releases too. > > I had a bug in 8.5 (a long-term release). Once they finally fixed it, > they told me they just weren't going to put it in 8.5 and that I had to > upgrade to 9.x. What is the point of "long term support" if there > really isn't going to be any attempt to release additional updates?
You pose a very interesting question. Did they give you a good response? Does supported mean they will just debug it, or actually provide the fix in the specified release? - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp