> Why do you believe this is a hash settings issue? Maybe because you didn't say anything about it?
> The egress load seems evenly distributed between the two active interfaces. > When the ae0 interface plateaus at 1Gbps , both physical interfaces plateau > at ~500Mbps. I've also read that layer-4 hashing can be CPU/memory > intensive. Would just layer-3 be sufficient? The Juniper router performs the hashing in hardware. CPU/memory isn't really relevant here. At our end we have recent experience with load balancing Internet traffic over 5 x 1 Gbps links. We used layer3 *and* layer-4 hashing, and got very good distribution of the traffic. We were able to fill all 5 links to capacity. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
