Unfortunately I have tested it but the result is that the policer operates independently on the 2 interfaces with the result that the total out of the 2 GE is 2000k and not 1000k.
Any idea way and how I can get it to work in aggregate fashion..... Thanks, bit. On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 13:53 +0200, Sean Clarke wrote: > The way you have done it, the bandwidth will be shared > > > Adding filter-specific knob to the policer will make them unique ... i.e. > > policer P { > filter-specific;<---- > if-exceeding { > bandwidth-limit 1000k; > burst-size-limit 15k; > } > then discard; > } > > > > On 4/15/09 1:33 PM, Bit Gossip wrote: > > platform MX480 junos 9.3 > > > > in the following config the same policer is appllied to 2 different > > interfaces via 2 different firewall filters. > > > > Will the policer police at 1 mbps the aggregate traffic of the 2 > > interfaces; or it will police independent at 1 mbps the 2 differrent > > interfaces? > > > > ge-5/2/1 { > > unit 0 { > > filter { > > output F1; > > } > > } > > } > > ge-5/2/2 { > > unit 0 { > > filter { > > output F2; > > } > > } > > } > > > > policer P { > > if-exceeding { > > bandwidth-limit 1000k; > > burst-size-limit 15k; > > } > > then discard; > > } > > > > filter F1 { > > term NATIONAL { > > from { > > source-class C1; > > } > > then { > > policer P; > > count C1; > > accept; > > } > > } > > term REMAINING { > > then { > > count REMAINING; > > accept; > > } > > } > > } > > filter F2 { > > term NATIONAL { > > from { > > source-class C2; > > } > > then { > > policer P; > > count C2; > > accept; > > } > > } > > term REMAINING { > > then { > > count REMAINING; > > accept; > > } > > } > > } > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp