Hi Re// Experts, do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0? According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q "VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which the frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to any VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is referred to as a priority tag"
How would I match this Juniper config: show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 vlan-tagging; unit 0 { vlan-id 0; family inet { address 1.1.1.1/30; } } on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from 1? Instead of configuring a subinterface configure ip under the main interface: //r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ? <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required r2(config-if)#ip address a.a.a.a m.m.m.m <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required Thanks, bit >Hamid Mazroui >Service Engineer RA/EMO ERICSSON /// >Business Center Aile Sud >Lot IB/S3 Hay Ryad-Rabat >Mobile : +212661798439 >Email : mazroui.ha...@ericsson.com > -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of juniper-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:12 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 80, Issue 10 Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to juniper-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net You can reach the person managing the list at juniper-nsp-ow...@puck.nether.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS) (Terry Baranski) 2. sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (Abhi) 3. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (mas...@nexlinx.net.pk) 4. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (sth...@nethelp.no) 5. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (Timo Mohre) 6. vlan-id 0 (Bit Gossip) 7. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (Abhi) 8. Re: vlan-id 0 (Nalkhande Tarique Abbas) 9. Re: vlan-id 0 (mas...@nexlinx.net.pk) 10. Re: vlan-id 0 (mas...@nexlinx.net.pk) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:18:35 -0400 From: "Terry Baranski" <tbaran...@mail.com> To: <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS) Message-ID: <000501ca0011$a7b4abc0$0a01a...@pleth0ra> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Andrew Cheng wrote: > is it okay to use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 20) multiple times on the > same physical interface? > > We want to use more than 255 VLANs on an physical interface so we have > to use the same group several times or use the same VRRP-group (i.e. > > 1) on every VLAN subunit. It works fine for us in practice, though you'll find bizarre statements to the contrary in the JunOS documentation, such as this in 9.1 and earlier: "The following restrictions apply: On a single routing platform, you cannot configure the same VRRP group on multiple interfaces" And this in newer versions: "On a single routing platform, you can assign a unique VRRP group to only one interface..." -Terry ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:05:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Abhi <vyaaghrah-...@yahoo.com> To: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 Message-ID: <826618.28298...@web31814.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi Guys while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am getting the following error. r...@bom-sc20# commit synchronize re0: [edit system services ssh] 'ssh' warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration check succeeds re1: [edit system services ssh] 'ssh' warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found below is the config services { ssh { protocol-version v2; can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process running, How can i start this process. Advice. Regards Abhijeet.C ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:28:57 +0500 (PKT) From: mas...@nexlinx.net.pk To: "Abhi" <vyaaghrah-...@yahoo.com> Cc: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 Message-ID: <50375.196.46.241.57.1247142537.squir...@nexmail1.nexlinx.net.pk> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 To use SSH on Juniper routers, you need to have JUNOS domestic release. To check this out you may execute the following command? show version OR more specific one :) (coz i love junos UNIX like matching style) show version | match Cryp The above command will let you know that you are running with a crypto package or not. If not then you have to get JUNOS domestic release Regards, Masood > Hi Guys > > while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am > getting the following error. > > > r...@bom-sc20# commit synchronize > re0: > [edit system services ssh] > 'ssh' > warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration > check succeeds > re1: > [edit system services ssh] > 'ssh' > warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found > > below is the config > > services { > ssh { > protocol-version v2; > > can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by > using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process > running, > > How can i start this process. > Advice. > > Regards > Abhijeet.C > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:34:35 +0200 (CEST) From: sth...@nethelp.no To: vyaaghrah-...@yahoo.com Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 Message-ID: <20090709.133435.71123571.sth...@nethelp.no> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii > while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am getting the following error. Completely expected if you're running the non-domestic version of the JunOS software. > can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by > using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process > running, You need to install the domestic version (jinstall-*-domestic-signed.tgz) which has ssh support. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:22:53 +0200 From: Timo Mohre <t...@tiscali.net> To: Abhi <vyaaghrah-...@yahoo.com> Cc: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 Message-ID: <4a55d30d.5000...@tiscali.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Are you using the Worrldwide junos image (no ssh) or the domestic junos image (ssh available)? /Timo Abhi wrote: > Hi Guys > > while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am getting the following error. > > > r...@bom-sc20# commit synchronize > re0: > [edit system services ssh] > 'ssh' > warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration > check succeeds > re1: > [edit system services ssh] > 'ssh' > warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found > > below is the config > > services { > ssh { > protocol-version v2; > > can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by > using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process > running, > > How can i start this process. > Advice. > > Regards > Abhijeet.C > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpV0w0ACgkQe5lbQTruUNXmgwCfYMgMY9ho4pV5crqMRlfj9rfK U7gAoJC7aTr2KhV7pTl9IgCKwro40EGb =qtuo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:43:22 +0200 From: Bit Gossip <bit.gos...@chello.nl> To: Juniper List <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0 Message-ID: <1247143402.3416.10.ca...@nlws481253> Content-Type: text/plain Experts, do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0? According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q "VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which the frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to any VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is referred to as a priority tag" How would I match this Juniper config: show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 vlan-tagging; unit 0 { vlan-id 0; family inet { address 1.1.1.1/30; } } on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from 1? r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ? <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required Thanks, bit ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:50:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Abhi <vyaaghrah-...@yahoo.com> To: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 Message-ID: <62852.88807...@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Yup on thing is sure I am running a Junos WW version. thanks Guys mas...@nexlinx.net.pk wrote: > To use SSH on Juniper routers, you need to have JUNOS domestic > release. To check this out you may execute the following command? > show version > OR more specific one :) (coz i love junos UNIX like matching style) > show version | match Cryp The above command will let you know that you > are running with a crypto package or not. If not then you have to get > JUNOS domestic release Regards, Masood >> Hi Guys >> >> while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i >> am getting the following error. >> >> >> r...@bom-sc20# commit synchronize >> re0: >> [edit system services ssh] >> 'ssh' >> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration >> check succeeds >> re1: >> [edit system services ssh] >> 'ssh' >> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found >> >> below is the config >> >> services { >> ssh { >> protocol-version v2; >> >> can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running >> by using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd >> process running, >> >> How can i start this process. >> Advice. >> >> Regards >> Abhijeet.C >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:09:33 +0530 From: Nalkhande Tarique Abbas <ntari...@juniper.net> To: "Bit Gossip" <bit.gos...@chello.nl>, "Juniper List" <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0 Message-ID: <855f9d2d4701374c950f39ad6c9d09370305d...@emailbng5.jnpr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Hi AFAIK, basically a unit 32767 is created implicitly when "vlan-tagging" is enabled to pass untagged control traffic (like STP, LACP ... etc). When a unit with vlan-id 0 is configured, this unit itself is used to send the control traffic. So the unit 32767 then gets deleted. ge-1/1/0 up up ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31 ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31 ge-1/1/0.32767 up up r...@sulfur# show | compare [edit interfaces ge-1/1/0] + unit 0 { + vlan-id 0; + } l...@sulfur> show interfaces terse | match ge-1/1/0 ge-1/1/0 up up ge-1/1/0.0 up up ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31 ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31 Thanks & Regards, Tarique A. Nalkhande -----Original Message----- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bit Gossip Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:13 PM To: Juniper List Subject: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0 Experts, do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0? According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q "VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which the frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to any VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is referred to as a priority tag" How would I match this Juniper config: show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 vlan-tagging; unit 0 { vlan-id 0; family inet { address 1.1.1.1/30; } } on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from 1? r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ? <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required Thanks, bit _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:20:51 +0500 (PKT) From: mas...@nexlinx.net.pk To: "Bit Gossip" <bit.gos...@chello.nl> Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0 Message-ID: <12305.196.46.241.57.1247152851.squir...@nexmail1.nexlinx.net.pk> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Some attached devices may not accept 802.1q-tagged frames, and therefore can reside only in VLAN 0. Conversely, some devices may accept only tagged frames, requiring that even frames in VLAN 0 be tagged. So JUNOS is providing you the way to deal with such boxs.. :D The range for valid VLAN IDs on Cisco kit is 1 to 4094 with VLAN 1 being the default VLAN. I suspect VLAN 1 might be what you are talking about when they refer to VLAN 0. However, to muddy the water, Cisco's documentation for the 3750 reveals that there IS a VLAN 0 - but only when you're using VOIP Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > Experts, > do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0? > According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q > "VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which > the frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to > any VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is > referred to as a priority tag" > > How would I match this Juniper config: > > show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 vlan-tagging; unit 0 { > vlan-id 0; > family inet { > address 1.1.1.1/30; > } > } > > on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from > 1? > > r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ? > <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required > > Thanks, > bit > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:15:43 +0500 (PKT) From: mas...@nexlinx.net.pk To: "Nalkhande Tarique Abbas" <ntari...@juniper.net> Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0 Message-ID: <26317.196.46.241.57.1247156143.squir...@nexmail1.nexlinx.net.pk> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Your configuration is missing "vlan-tagging" Is behaviour remains the same if you add "vlan-tagging" under interface configuration. Regards, Masood Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/ > > Hi > > AFAIK, basically a unit 32767 is created implicitly when "vlan-tagging" > is enabled to pass untagged control traffic (like STP, LACP ... etc). > When a unit with vlan-id 0 is configured, this unit itself is used to > send the control traffic. So the unit 32767 then gets deleted. > > > > ge-1/1/0 up up > ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31 > ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31 > ge-1/1/0.32767 up up > > r...@sulfur# show | compare > [edit interfaces ge-1/1/0] > + unit 0 { > + vlan-id 0; > + } > > l...@sulfur> show interfaces terse | match ge-1/1/0 > ge-1/1/0 up up > ge-1/1/0.0 up up > ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31 > ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31 > > > > Thanks & Regards, > Tarique A. Nalkhande > > > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bit Gossip > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:13 PM > To: Juniper List > Subject: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0 > > Experts, > do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0? > According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q > "VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which > the frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to > any VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is > referred to as a priority tag" > > How would I match this Juniper config: > > show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 vlan-tagging; unit 0 { > vlan-id 0; > family inet { > address 1.1.1.1/30; > } > } > > on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from > 1? > > r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ? > <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required > > Thanks, > bit > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 80, Issue 10 ******************************************* _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp