Got that...From an old post... I wanted to do a multi point since I knew it
would work.. But seems like Harry did confirm that..
I would try adding the multipoint keyword under the interface unit, and also
add mapping for each remote dlci. The latter is needed due to lack of inarp
response (if that is still the case).
unit 0 { <<<<<multipoint; dlci 100; family inet { address
10.0.2.5/30{<<<<<< multipoint-destination 10.0.2.6 dlci 100; } } }
At both ends.
HTHs
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Hoogen <hooge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> For a good measure I checked the link ip address between 10.0.2.5 and
> 10.0.2.6 there is no netmask issues.... This is a requirement as stated in
> OSPF case study in JNCIP book. To make the link between R3-R4 to have a DR
> election... So i made it an nbma interface... which is now causing the
> adjacency to break.....
>
> I verified the hello packets by the interface detail command... it does
> show up as 30 and 120 (h/D)... so no issues there...
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated...
>
>
> Interface configuration
>
> R3
> t1-1/0/0 {
> hold-time up 30 down 30;
> encapsulation frame-relay;
> lmi {
> n392dte 2;
> n393dte 3;
> t391dte 15;
> lmi-type itu;
> }
> unit 100 {
> bandwidth 155m;
> dlci 100;
> family inet {
> address 10.0.2.5/30;
> }
> }
> }
> #######
> area 0.0.0.0 {
> interface t1-1/0/0.100 {
> interface-type nbma;
> neighbor 10.0.2.6 eligible;
> }
>
>
> R4
>
> t1-1/0/0 {
> dce;
> hold-time up 30 down 30;
> encapsulation frame-relay;
> lmi {
> n392dce 2;
> n393dce 3;
> t392dce 25;
> lmi-type itu;
> }
> unit 100 {
> bandwidth 155m;
> dlci 100;
> family inet {
> address 10.0.2.6/30;
> }
> }
> }
>
> ########
>
> area 0.0.0.0 {
> interface t1-1/0/0.100 {
> interface-type nbma;
> neighbor 10.0.2.5 eligible;
> }
>
> Sep 9 17:07:54.604230 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.0.2.5 -> 10.0.2.6 (t1-1/0/0.100,
> IFL 0x44)
> Sep 9 17:07:54.604237 Version 2, length 44, ID 10.0.3.3, area 0.0.0.0
> Sep 9 17:07:54.604242 checksum 0x0, authtype 0
> Sep 9 17:07:54.604248 mask 255.255.255.252, hello_ivl 30, opts 0x2, prio
> 128
> Sep 9 17:07:54.604253 dead_ivl 120, DR 0.0.0.0, BDR 0.0.0.0
> *Sep 9 17:07:54.604259 OSPF packet ignored: netmask 255.255.255.252
> mismatch from 10.0.2.5*
>
> Did google... but nothing on what I might be doing wrong....
> l...@r3#
> *** ospf ***
> Sep 9 17:29:42.537312 OSPF sent Hello -> 10.0.2.6 (t1-1/0/0.100, IFL 0x47)
> Sep 9 17:29:42.538006 OSPF sent Hello 10.0.2.5 -> 10.0.2.6 (t1-1/0/0.100,
> IFL 0x47)
> Sep 9 17:29:45.656935 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.0.2.6 -> 10.0.2.5 (t1-1/0/0.100,
> IFL 0x47)
> *Sep 9 17:29:45.657005 OSPF packet ignored: netmask 255.255.255.252
> mismatch from 10.0.2.6*
> Sep 9 17:29:46.556973 OSPF rcvd Hello 10.0.2.6 -> 10.0.2.5 (t1-1/0/0.100,
> IFL 0x47)
> Sep 9 17:29:46.557059 OSPF packet ignored: netmask 255.255.255.252 mismatch
> from 10.0.2.6
> Sep 9 17:29:49.336728 OSPF 10.0.2.6 DBD cleanup complete
> Sep 9 17:29:49.336765 OSPF sent Hello -> 10.0.2.6 (t1-1/0/0.100, IFL 0x47)
> run monitor stop
>
> [edit]
> l...@r3#
>
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
