Hi Dermot,
I can't say I've ever tried using a sub-interface for PPPoE before,
but here's a config snippet for creating the ppp interface and binding
it to the logical interface you've already created:
interfaces {
pp0 {
unit 0 {
ppp-options {
chap {
default-chap-secret "$9$te9Jp0IXxd24ZxN4ZDHTQ"; ##
SECRET-DATA
local-name "u...@domain.com.au";
passive;
}
}
pppoe-options {
underlying-interface fe-0/0/0.128;
client;
}
no-keepalives;
family inet {
mtu 1452;
negotiate-address;
}
}
}
}
You can't specify an ethernet interface as a next hop, but you can
specify the pp0.0 interface.
Cheers,
Ben
On 02/10/2009, at 5:50 PM, Dermot Williams wrote:
Hi,
Either I fail at searching the docs or the docs fail at providing the
info but I'm having a bit of trouble getting a working PPPoE
configuration on a J4300.
Firstly, is it possible to use a logical interface (e.g., fe-0/0/0.128)
as a PPPoE interface? The router lets me set the encapsulation on the
interface to ppp-over-ethernet but I can't take it for granted that that
means I have a working config.
Also, how do I indicate to the router what packets should bring up the
PPP session? There doesn't seem to be a way in JunOS (8.1, admittedly)
to specify that the next-hop for a given subnet is an interface.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dermot
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
