Harry Reynolds wrote:
For draft rosen I would suggest gre rather than mpls p-2-mp. Not sure
that latter is even supported.

There are a few other interop notes, but depends on if you plan
rosen6 or rosen7.

In either case, you need to have a lo0.x with the same ip as the main
instance lo0 in each mvpn vrf. This is addresses with 10.0R2 rli
11113, but until then, this is how it is.

Useful to know, though we've found the "duplicate" lo0.x to be trouble-free.


For rosen7 you need ios that supports the inet-mdt bgp family, and
you must ensure those routes are tagged with the extended RT comm.
This too is addressed in 10.0R2, with rli 11114.

That's interesting. So, 10.0R2 will inter-op with e.g. 12.2(33)S IOS using SSM groups in the P-space e.g. on the cisco:

ip vrf XXX
 rd y:1
 route-target export y:1
 route-target import y:1
 mdt default 232.254.1.3
 mdt data 232.254.3.0 0.0.0.255 threshold 256

router bgp XXXX
 address-family ipv4 mdt
   neighbor a.b.c.d activate
 address-family vpnv4
   neighbor a.b.c.d activate

Previously this didn't work because the junipers & cisco have no mutually-compatible way of discovering the SSM data MDTs. It works fine with ASM in the P-space.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to