>To me it seems that this particular point is currently not clearly defined > (see also the differing views on this in this thread: >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg00745.html). > >Looking at the implementations of three particular vendors, all three of >them behave differently in this regard.
The feedback I've had previously from Juniper is the re-establishment of the adjacency even though BFD is filtered is intended behaviour. A BFD session isn't a requirement for re-establishing the adjacency - BFD is instead used for tearing down the adjacency in case of BFD timeout *after* the BFD session has been established. Cheers Martin _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
