On 3/02/2010, at 2:21 AM, Mike Kiefer wrote: > > Pardon my ignorance with Juniper gear. I have a problem that probably pretty > easy to fix, but I'm not sure how to do it. > > I have a single M10i with multiple routing-instances. It's running what Cisco > would call "vrf-lite", i.e. no MPLS. Every remote site has either multiple > vlans/vrfs or PVCs/vrfs. Separate OSPF routing tables are maintained end to > end. > > I want to leak routes from one instance into the other and vice-versa. I ran > a test on Olives and used the next-table command on each of two routers. It > worked. When I try to leak between both tables on one router using the > next-table command, I get a next-table may loop error. > > What I would like to do is generate a default route within the native VRF via > OSPF and have all of the route leaking happen on the M10i. The end nodes > would use the native VRF and default route to make it back to the M10i. I > don't want to provision a VRF/routing instance at the remote end just to do > leaking. > > Is there a way to make this work with next-table statics without getting the > "next-table may loop"? > > Should I abandon the whole next-table option and do something entirely > different? > > I would appreciate some pointers, and maybe a quick little config snipet if > possible. > > > Thanks, > > Mike >
I would recommend that you consider using virtual-router routing instances instead of VRFs if you are not using MPLS. You can create a RIB group for OSPF and import the default route into each table via RIB group import policy. You do not even need next-table, etc ... as you will actually copy the OSPF or interface routes between the tables. Check out: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos94/swconfig-routing/creating-routing-table-groups.html#id-10439786 Truman _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
