On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:18:24AM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote: > We generally try to stay away from anything pre-R3 or R4 > (depending on the history of R1 and R2). I haven't had a > chance to try JUNOS 9.6 or 10.0, but this is mostly > influenced by how terrible 9.x has been, and we're done > "chasing" JUNOS.
Couldn't agree more. Everything since 8.4 has averaged out to two bugs added for every one bug fixed. Of course you can't assume that just because it is an R4 that it will be stable, since any new issues which come in after that just get moved to being dealt with in future versions (where there are all new bugs!), and there are no R5's. :) > Too bad 9.5R4 has been seriously delayed. Groan. What's the latest on this, last I heard it was supposed to be out last week? -- Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
