Thanks, I am still stumped on the effect (or seeming lack thereof) of burst-size-limit given the fact that the same amount of packets is always getting through the policer on a burst, despite changing this value.
-J Scott On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Phill Jolliffe <phill.jolli...@gmail.com>wrote: > This link claims all L2 header is counted. But as best I remember frames > FCS is stripped and regen'd be each PE. > > > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos95/swconfig-vpns/id-11513841.html#id-11525104 > > Not found a mention of IFG. > > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Judah Scott > <judah.scott....@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Is there a document that can explain the attached code block for us? In >> case the screen shot isn't clear, I am basically just sending a >> single-shot >> of traffic (the packets are sent over 1 second) with, or without, a >> baseline >> constant traffic which is below the policed rate. >> >> Questions I have are: >> Does "bandwidth-limit" include Inter-frame Gap? Does it include L2 >> header? >> What does the "burst-size-limit" (MBS) actually do because looking at my >> attached gif it doesn't seem to have any effect on bursts. No matter what >> I >> set the MBS to I lose packets (not shown but the results are identical for >> 100g MBS as the rest of the lines in the file). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > > > -- > Phill Jolliffe > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
