On Feb 18, 2010, at 2:08 AM, Georgios Vlachos wrote:
Hello list,
I know non juniper SFP work in MX but would you be worried if you
they are
not recognized at all by chassisd? Moreover show chassis hardware or
pic-status does not list the SFPs at all. On the other hand the
links come
up and forward traffic with no apparent errors. Would you feel
confident
about it?
l...@mx960_ lab# run show log chassisd| last
.
Feb 16 15:50:10 pic_copy_port_info:Got cable_type for FPC 0 PIC 2
port 6
cable num=0, str=
We typically use vendor-endorsed SFPs for production / core / critical
links. If need to cut costs on a project, we'll use 3rd party modules
for interfaces servicing non-critical stuff (like local servers,
secondary systems, testing networks, etc). While the cost difference
isn't huge, sometimes a few hundred dollars could mean getting a
project approved in my environment.
--
Brad Fleming
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
