On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:10:12PM -0700, Tommy Perniciaro wrote: > Yes - that's correct. > > Junos will complain about not having the license but BGP will still > work, same deal on the J series not having the route reflector > license, still works just complains :)
EX's BGP license is (last I checked) stil nagware which can be filtered or ignored, though I'm sure that will change over time. J-series' BGP route-reflector license on the other hand is now hard enforced (any neighbors with clusters configured will not come up) as of at least a year+ ago (somewhere in the 8.x's I think). The ironic part is J-series is absolutely worthless as a route-reflector, it suffers *heavily* from the slow route installation bug, and if you ask Juniper about it they say J-series CPU is mostly locked towards forwarding packets rather than processing BGP, and is not intended to be a BGP route reflector (and yet they're still taking your money for the BGP RR licenses, go figure :P). -- Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
