> > You can "turn off" the netscreen flow style of forwarding and fall back > > to packet based forwarding in J series and SRX for that matter. But > > still, the perfomance number stays the same even if you keep the flow > > based forwarding instead och packet based. > > It seems that this is (a) un(der)documented and (b) results in strange > stability issues. The box turns unresponsive during commits and > eventually hangs (with just one BGP feed and 1 GB RAM).
We have, sadly, stopped thinking about J series as an alternative to Cisco CPEs. We have several J2320 boxes in the lab, all running 9.3R3.8 (the last "regular" JunOS version for the J series). At this point I don't see us getting any more J series boxes... Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
