Hi Patrik Thanks for your information.
-- With Thanks, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Debashis On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Patrik Olsson <d...@webkom.se> wrote: > The way I see it it is not the number of vrf:s that is the limitation, > it will be the rib and fib size. Then how you distribute that between > vrf:s wont matter. > > I havent seen any official tests of number of vrf:s, but assume that 500 > vrf:s should work. But I figure 4000 vrf:s might work aswell. > > This is based on that Juniper creates a label per vrf and PE, not per > route and PE that Cisco does, so L3VPN is not consuming so much fib. But > all routes will be in rib of course. > > Patrik > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
