Thanks, we're going to try these steps out and I will let you know.


El 05/05/2010 4:30, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim escribió:
without studying your topology in detail, i think the best reason that can be explained by your rtsockmon output is there is spurious routing updates in your topology. these updates are typically triggered by link flaps or bgp flaps by way of MED selection or there could be others as well. i think you can check monitoring a specific route in your RR see whether that the updates are being caused by MED calculation.

On 5 May 2010 01:18, Juniper <juni...@iber-x.com <mailto:juni...@iber-x.com>> wrote:

    Hi,

    In this router, we have configured 2 logical router. In the
    'physical' we have only one provider (one full-routing) and in the
    logical one we are connected to 2 providers (2 full-routing). Are
    these events for both logical routers? They are differents
    providers, why should I configure always-compare-med? Although we
    have a redundance session BGP with one of these provider in other
    router in our AS.
    Would you recommend us to use this sentence in the configurations?
    We are not sure because we have implemented to filter the routes
    'communities' and 'local-preferences' but we don't use
    always-compare-med.

    These configuration is applied since a lot of years, almost 5
    years and we never had these events in our log.

    My apologies about asking you so many questions but we never had
    these type of logs in our Juniper M20 and we have to understand
    first to apply this parameter in our configuration.

    Thanks a lot for your time,

    Matthew



    El 04/05/2010 17:10, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim escribió:
    Looks like there's a persistent oscillation in your routing
    topology. If you see routes i.e. 195.240.208.0 that comes from
    different peer ASes, you might want to configure
    always-compare-med in your bgp path-selection statement. By
    default, it will only compare routes that come from the same peer AS.

    On 4 May 2010 23:54, Juniper <juni...@iber-x.com
    <mailto:juni...@iber-x.com>> wrote:

        Hello,

        I've just executed this comand on the shell and it appeared a
        lot of routes:

        r...@eg01% rtsockmon -t rpd
                sender   flag    type       op
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6 2401:ee00::
        tid=2 plen=32 type=user flags=0x10 nh=indr nhflags=0x4
        nhidx=262144 filtidx=0
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6
        2401:ee00:1c1c::2001:668 tid=0 plen=32 type=user flags=0x0
        nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      change  inet6
        2401:ee00:1c1c::2001:668 tid=2 plen=32 type=user flags=0x10
        nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262151 filtidx=0
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6
        2400:6800:1c1c::2001:668 tid=0 plen=32 type=user flags=0x0
        nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6
        2400:6800:1c1c::2001:668 tid=2 plen=32 type=user flags=0x10
        nh=indr nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262151 filtidx=0
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6
        2404:8000:f:0:1c1c:: tid=0 plen=48 type=user flags=0x0
        nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6
        2404:8000:5:0:1c1c:: tid=0 plen=48 type=user flags=0x0
        nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
        [17:30:29] rpd      P    route      add     inet6
        2404:8000:c:0:1c1c:: tid=0 plen=48 type=user flags=0x0
        nh=ucst nhflags=0x1 nhidx=591 filtidx=0
        [...]
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet
        195.140.208.0 tid=0 plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr
        nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 85.197.112.0
        tid=0 plen=20 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr nhflags=0x4
        nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet
        195.225.208.0 tid=0 plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr
        nhflags=0x4 nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.158.54.0
        tid=0 plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=indr nhflags=0x4
        nhidx=262147 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 195.158.54.0
        tid=2 plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1
        nhidx=573 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 85.197.112.0
        tid=2 plen=20 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1
        nhidx=573 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet
        195.140.208.0 tid=2 plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst
        nhflags=0x1 nhidx=573 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet
        195.225.208.0 tid=2 plen=22 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst
        nhflags=0x1 nhidx=573 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet
        148.247.205.0 tid=2 plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst
        nhflags=0x1 nhidx=583 filtidx=0
        [17:30:31] rpd      P    route      change  inet 148.247.22.0
        tid=2 plen=24 type=user flags=0x0 nh=ucst nhflags=0x1
        nhidx=583 filtidx=0
        [..]

        The output is very long ( I had to stopped after 3 minutes)
        and we don't know if that is normal o no. What should we do?
        Is it possible to clean this routes?

        Thanks a lot for your help,

        Matthew


        El 04/05/2010 15:14, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim escribió:
        you can check for persistent routing updates i.e. flaps by
        running rtsockmon -t rpd on the shell.

        On 4 May 2010 22:04, Juniper <juni...@iber-x.com
        <mailto:juni...@iber-x.com>> wrote:

            Hello there,

            This message has appeared in the log of our M20. It is
            not the first time it occurs and we are quite worried.
            The average CPU consumption is 4% and just at the time
            the message appeared on the log, we found increases up
            to 100% and an increase in temperature of 6 º in the
            routing-engine 0. This router works with two logical
            routers and receive full-routing of three different
            providers. We also have configured and IS-IS  and IBGP
            sessions.

            May 4 11:43:03 xxx01.yyy2.abc-d.net
            <http://xxx01.yyy2.abc-d.net> LEV[2625]: RPD_SCHED_SLIP:
            7 sec scheduler slip, user: 3 sec 306043 usec, system: 0
            sec, 5732 usec

            We do not know what could be the problem because we have
            not detected any event bgp, routing update, addition of
            new machines, etc.
            Do you have any idea what may be the reason for this
            high cpu usage?

            Thanks in advance,

            Matthew
            _______________________________________________
            juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
            <mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
            https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp




-- Thank you for your time,
        Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim




-- Thank you for your time,
    Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim




--
Thank you for your time,
Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to