The motivation for this requirement is not all that clear and I suspect may have some bearing on a solution. Is the backbone requirement because your forwarding on MPLS headers? If so, I do not think that any of the MSS tweaks are going to help you. Unfortunately, your third party circuit leaves you very little wiggle room, you might just be out of luck on that path. Conversely, if the requirement is coming from the application side, you might consider a WAN Optimization Controller.... It's not a straight forward payload compression thing, but I think that they can operate in any point-to-point Ethernet environment and effectively proxy the TCP sessions locally. that might get you bye. good luck
rgds, --r On Jul 7, 2010, at 1:59 AM, Humair Ali wrote: > Hi All > > MX480 > Junos 9.6 R3 > > We are experiencing some MTU issue on one of our circuit. > > We have been provided a circuit by a 3rd party provider that only supports > MTU size 1518, > > Unfortunately it seems they cannot provide Jumbo Frames, > > However for our backbone we required to have Jumbo Frames supported. > > My question is , is there any such option as MTU compression available ? > > something that would allow a packet of 9192 coming into our MX480 , then be > comrpessed to 1518 accross the Circuit provider link, then De-compress on > our MX480 on the other end ? > > I have been looking on docs but couldnt anything as such > > your help much appreciate, if someone came accross similar and found a > workaround , please share > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
