On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:11:15AM -0700, Salik Mobin wrote: > Dear Fellows, > > Can anyone suggest a stable Junos from 10.x trail?
You can't really make generalizations about JUNOS as a whole, it depends on which platform you're talking about... That said, at this exact moment we're actually having surprisingly good results (i.e. so far nothing major/new has blown up, and the number of serious outstanding bugs is lower than average) with 10.1S6 on both MX (not tested with Trio though) and EX8200. 10.0 is the only extended support release until 10.4, so you might want to give it some consideration, but in our testing it still had a lot of serious issues leading all the way up to 10.0R4. Our general theory is that we're going to stick with 10.1 for EX8200 for a while (trying to squeeze as many major fixes as possible for all the outstanding huge bugs into 10.1R4), but we're gonna be forced into 10.2+ for MX to get full Trio support soon anyways, so there isn't much benefit to hanging around 10.0 even if it was stable. -- Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp