Hello Gerhard, On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Prochaska Gerhard <gerhard.procha...@a1telekom.at> wrote: > I was at the Juniper LAB in Amsterdam last week for a POC LAB on MPC2 (2 MIC > with 4x10G) and 16x10G MPC on Junos > 10.2p2. I asked the same question and wanted to know why we do the POC LAB on > 10.2 and not the already released 10.3. > From what i understood there are no relevant bugfixes when it comes to MPC > Cards In R 10.3.
Thanks for that information. >From the release notes I see no mention of trio related bugs fixed. I have not yet heard from the Juniper SE what he advises. > In the LAB we did some IPV4 and IPV6 OSPF, OSPF V3 and BGP Scalability Tests > and throughput vs. Packetsize Test > on the MPC2 (2 MIC with 4x10G) and 16x10G MPC. Especially the DPC to MPC > Interworking is important for us for we see > the new cards as high density cards which might help us in our ISP nodes > where slots are nearly full. We have not yet started testing, but are planning to use - v4 and v6 OSPF and BGP - route reflector - MPC only linecards, we have no DPC's All in all pretty basic, feature wise.. We did have our first MPC crash today. (on 10.3) Possibly related to enabling BGP..... A second MPC is giving strange errors too. "fpc4 MQCHIP(3) FI Cell underflow at the state stage" I'll keep you updated on our findings. Bas _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
