> you could try this knob: "set routing-options ppm no-delegate-processing"
Yes, that would make BFD run on the RE. As the original poster assumed, the performance is indeed lower. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Payam Chychi <pchy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering if anyone else has had issues with M based routers and PPM, > > if so, any advice would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Here is my situation: > > - I have a m120 router that is now running BFD and IS-IS on a few links and > > OSPF on a few other links (no problem here) > > - when I take a backup feb out of backup (N+1 group) and map it to a fpc, > > the router drops all ISIS neighbors. > > > > A deeper look into the issue showed that ISIS is dropping because of BFD, a > > 3rd look showed that BFD was dieing due to the PPM > > > > I'm assuming that the issue is related with PPM running on both feb and re. > > Are there any caveats in disabling PPM on the FEB and letting it run only > > on the RE? > > > > I assume the performance would be lower as its done in software vs the hw > > FEB but i cant imagine the difference to be noteworthy > > > > Thanks > > Payam > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > > > -- > BR! > > > > James Chen > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp