On 18/12/10 07:28, Chris Morrow wrote: > yea, so... from: > <http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000215-en.pdf> > > "AFL includes licenses for IS-IS, BGP, MPLS and IPv6 routing"
While we're on the topic, I'm still annoyed at this. Juniper have publicly stated that they won't charge for IPv6, so why are they still doing so on EX? I can currently use OSPF3 due to what I presume is a bug in licence enforcement, but that's not really a sane long-term option. See Dave Ward's talk at the Google IPv6 implementers conference: https://sites.google.com/site/ipv6implementors/2010/agenda -- Julien Goodwin Studio442 "Blue Sky Solutioneering"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp