Do you have multiple LSPs defined (one for each path you want to load balance over)?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Telmo Di Leva <tdil...@ifxcorp.com> wrote: > Dear JNSP, in this oportunity we are contacting you because we have the > following trouble: > Our core plataform is based on M20 and M160. > For some reason, we cant balance mpls traffic thru multiples oc3. > We have this links explaining our limitation whit M series: > > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos9.5/information-products/topic-collections/config-guide-mpls-applications/mpls-configuring-load-balancing-for-mpls-lsps.html > Note: You can include this combination of statements on M320 and T-series > routing platforms only. If you include them on an M-series router, only the > first MPLS label and the IP payload are used in the hash key. > Can this would be a problem to balance traffic in our backbone? > We cant find a way to fix the unbalanced mpls traffic. > Is corrected in some JUNOS version for M series? > We will really apreciate your help. > Bes regards. > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > -- Matthew Tighe matthew.e.ti...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp