Hi Richard, On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Richard Zheng <rzh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > SRX seems to be a really good candidate. It looks like all models have > almost identical features, the only difference is performance. I will buy a > SRX100, maybe even 2 to test high availability.
I can only speak for J and SRX as I have no first hand experience with M ... I recently did some performance testing of SRX240, J6350 and SRX650 -- in terms of pps, they come out in that order; SRX240 is out-performed by J6350 which is out-performed by SRX650. That might seem obvious as it's the same sequence dollars-wise but just because J is an older platform doesn't mean everything SRX is 'better'. If the SRX240 meets your pps needs, it's a great box; dirt cheap for what it can do. It's a big leap price-wise from SRX240 to SRX650. Cheers, Dale _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp