On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Diogo Montagner <diogo.montag...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Do you have FRR enabled on the LSPs ? > Node protection and link-protection is the same thing as fast re-route. Is it configured correctly though? You have to configure a secondary path under protocols mpls and then enable it for FRR/node protection. You can't just enable it and have it work. Also, what does the topology look like? Could you just be waiting for customer routing/spanning tree? Even without FRR your lsp's failover at the speed of your IGP when a link is shut down. None of them take 41 seconds. > > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Gökhan Gümüş <ggu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I have a problem with one of our customer. > > > > Customer has been deployed with VPLS. We are using primary path and > > secondary path ( standby ) to handle VPLS traffic between sites. > > > > Within a maintenance window, we made a failover test. Customer was > pinging > > remote site continuosly and we would like to test how many packets are > being > > lost during switchover. When i triggered transition from primary to > > secondary, customer lost 41 packets during ping test. Then i implemented > > node-link-protection and link protection in case they help but customer > > experienced same amount of packet loss during transition. > > > > My question, is it a normal behaviour? From my perspective it is not a > > normal behaviour. > > > > Has anybody such an experince? > > > > Thanks and regards, > > > > Gokhan > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp