-- Sorry if this posts twice. It was posted yesterday and I didn't see it come though --
I'm seeing some strange behavior with a EX3200 10.4R3.4 with how it receives bgp routes. The output below shows peer 172.16.2.12 that is sending a full table. The EX is accepting a 0.0.0.0/0 exact and 0.0.0.0/0 upto /19. I should be seeing 350k in the Received and about 28k in the Active (yes, I know EX's can't handle 28k). What it appears is happening is that I'm only 'Receiving' a subset of the full table and then a /0 upto /19 smattering of that 65k. admin@ex3200-24t> show bgp summary Groups: 2 Peers: 2 Down peers: 1 Table Tot Paths Act Paths Suppressed History Damp State Pending inet.0 16365 4371 0 0 0 0 Peer AS InPkt OutPkt OutQ Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Accepted/Damped... 172.16.2.12 64512 92672 2035 0 0 15:12:10 4371/16365/4372/0 0/0/0/0 Here's my import policy. Fairly basic. policy-statement BGPIMPORT { term SEQ-100 { from { protocol bgp; route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 exact; route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 upto /19; } then accept; } term SEQ-101 { then reject; } } Now in contrast, a SRX210 is seeing: admin@SRX210-TEST> show bgp summary Groups: 2 Peers: 2 Down peers: 0 Table Tot Paths Act Paths Suppressed History Damp State Pending inet.0 353872 76 0 0 0 0 Peer AS InPkt OutPkt OutQ Flaps Last Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Accepted/Damped... 172.16.2.12 64512 173198 6642 0 2 2d 2:00:56 75/353871/76/0 0/0/0/0 Obviously my SRX import policy is different and therefore accepting less, however the point is that the 'Received' is consistent with what I would expect to see on the EX3200. admin@SRX210-TEST> show version Hostname: SRX210-TEST Model: srx210b JUNOS Software Release [10.2R3.10] So, if the EX is filtering a percentage of the received routes, is this proportional? IOW, if I should be receiving 8k routes, do I only see 1k being received? Is this new undesired behavior introduced in 10.4R3.4? I don't have another EX in test that I can verify this with earlier code. I don't know if I can downgrade to say a 10.2 version now that my Resilient Dual-Root Partitions and new jloader are installed. It would be nice to verify this on earlier code and submit a bug if it's warranted. Thank you in advance for any thoughts on this. -b -- Bill Blackford Network Engineer Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges..... _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp