Hi Dusan 

Thanks for your response

Also we configured the same prefix over GigabitEthernet interface
connecting both devices and everything looks ok (even is-is V6), but
with the Agregatted sonnet does not,

regards

Mario  

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Dusan Avbreht <d.avbr...@gmail.com>
Para: Mario Andres Rueda Jaimes <maeve2...@gmail.com>
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Asunto: Re: [j-nsp] Ipv6 over Aggregated Sonet
Fecha: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:34:09 +0200

Hi Mario,

Version 10.4 till revision R4 have problem with IPv6 next-hope
reachability. Tray with 10.4R4.5 and it works!

Regards,
Dusan 

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Mario Andres Rueda Jaimes
<maeve2...@gmail.com> wrote:
        Hi All
        
        We are trying to configure IPv6 addressing, between a M20 and
        M160
        running junos 10.4 and 9.6 respectively over aggregated sonet
        interface,
        the main issue is that is-is (V6) adjacency don't comes up, the
        two Ip
        addresses are reachable each other via ICMP, but the neighbor
        doesn't.
        Instead,  ipv4 is-is runs ok.
        
        I think that the problem is that  Agreggate Sonnet interfaces
        doesn't
        have any  mac-address associated by default. The official
        documentation
        I've been read says that no problem is  espected activating ipv6
        over
        aggregated sonnet interfaces
        
         Anybody has any kind of suggestions about this case ?
        
        
        Thanks
        
        Mario Rueda
        
        _______________________________________________
        juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
        https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



-- 
________________________________
DuĊĦan Avbreht
Professional Service Consultant

AVDUS d.o.o.

Mobile: +386 41 340546
E: d.avbr...@gmail.com
E: du...@avdus.net


_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to