Correction, I said Path Tear in my previous message, rather I meant Path Err...

Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-ER #70, JNCIE-M #513, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
http://www.shortestpathfirst.net
http://www.twitter.com/sfouant

On 7/7/2011 12:15 AM, Stefan Fouant wrote:
On 7/6/2011 11:50 AM, David Ball wrote:
Just looking for confirmation of a suspicion here.

If I have an LSP configured with link-protection on every interface
along the way (creating many-to-one Bypass LSPs, as opposed to 1:1
detours), no secondary standby path defined, and a protected interface
fails, the ingress node will have no ability to perform a
make-before-break, right? Because the Path Tear messages will be sent
both upstream and downstream from the failed interface? The bypass
will only help me up until the upstream nodes process the Path Tears
and a new LSP is signalled from the ingress node....or am I missing
something?

Hi David,

The bypass is only used temporarily to save the traffic that is already
traversing the LSP. At the same time that the bypass LSP is being used,
the node which established the Bypass around the failure will will send
the Path Tear message upstream towards the Ingress LSR.

Once the Ingress LSR receives the Path Tear it may signal an alternate
path assuming some Secondary paths have been configured. You could have
the Secondary LSP set up as a Standby in which case it is pre-signaled
but will require double the amount of reservation state in the network.
This is inherently make-before-break because the Secondary Standby is
already established by the time your Primary has failed.

Another option is to configure the Adaptive option which will force the
Ingress LSR to continue using the Primary LSP (traversing a Bypass)
until it has signaled the Secondary path and only once the secondary has
been established will it cease using the Primary. This has the benefit
of also reducing the amount of reservation state in the network due to
the fact that Adaptive option signals LSPs using the Shared Explicit style.

HTHs,

Stefan Fouant
JNCIE-ER #70, JNCIE-M #513, JNCI
Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks
http://www.shortestpathfirst.net
http://www.twitter.com/sfouant
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to