On 9/20/11 10:26 , Keegan Holley wrote: > Is it always necessary to take in a full table? Why or why not? In light > of the Saudi Telekom fiasco I'm curious what others thing. This question is > understandably subjective. We have datacenters with no more than three > upstreams. We would obviously have to have a few copies of the table for > customers that want to receive it from us, but I'm curious if it is still > necessary to have a full table advertised from every peering. Several ISP's > will allow you to filter everything longer than say /20 and then receive a > default. Just curious what others think and if anyone is doing this.
given the large number of people who have a default as a backup (which can be empirically measured) there are plenty of things you can do to avoid taking a full table, with relatively minor impact. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
