Haha looks like Robert already responded to you... At least it's nice to know I'm not crazy and someone else would give you similar advice... :-b
Stefan Fouant JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate Sent from my iPad On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Stefan Fouant <sfou...@shortestpathfirst.net> wrote: > If you are using EX Series, take a look at PVLANs - > http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.0/topics/concept/private-vlans-ex-series.html > > This allows you to split broadcast domains into separate isolated broadcast > subdomains to constrain connectivity while at the same time keeping devices > in the same subnet and thereby reducing your overall IP address utilization. > > HTHs. > > Stefan Fouant > JNCIE-SEC, JNCIE-SP, JNCIE-ER, JNCI > Technical Trainer, Juniper Networks > > Follow us on Twitter @JuniperEducate > > Sent from my iPad > > On Oct 10, 2011, at 4:59 AM, Richard Zheng <rzh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Here is our setup. Customer A comes in on vlan 2001, customer B on vlan 2002 >> and etc. We may uses separate subnets for each vlan. However it wastes lots >> of IPs. Is there a way to use the same subnet, e.g. vlan 2001 uses IP >> 10.0.0.10, and vlan 2002 uses IP 10.0.0.11 and 10.0.0.12. How about use >> 10.0.0.1/24 as loopback, enable proxy-arp on each vlan, then put a filter on >> each interface to only allow assigned IP to go through? >> >> Would this work on M7i/M10i? >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
