Hello,
As far as I understand you are talking of OSPF/LDP and BGP in the same site.
Our implementation have the protocols on different sites. I made some tests
and the problem I see is
that on the site with BGP there are no routes with label advertised towards
the client carrier router.
There are only routes but no labels.
Can you share your config used?
BR,
Tasho Shukerski
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim" <ihsan.juna...@gmail.com>
To: "Tasho Shukerski" <tasho.shuker...@btc-net.bg>
Cc: <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Carrier-of-Carriers question
Hi,
I don't see why you can't.
We have one running in our network.
Depending on your CoC node topology, you may need to be extra watchful on
potential loops or unefficient routing caused primarily by next-hops being
mutually distributed by OSPF/LDP and BGP.
On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Tasho Shukerski wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have Carrier-of-Carriers working
scenario with one site implemented
with OSPF/LDP and the other using eBGP with labeled-unicast?
Thanks in advance,
Tasho Shukerski
Vivacom
Network engineer
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
