If my memory is correct, 11.x supports IPv6 with lt.

Sent from my iPhone

On Dec 23, 2011, at 8:14, Eric Van Tol <e...@atlantech.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
> Is frame-relay encapsulation not supported on the MX80 logical tunnel 
> interfaces?  I'm on 10.4R8.5 and need to configure IPv6 on an lt- interface:
> 
> Interface on the default instance:
> 
> # show interfaces lt-0/0/10 
> unit 1 {
>    encapsulation frame-relay;
>    dlci 128;
>    peer-unit 1;
>    family inet {
>        address 192.168.209.201/30;
>    }
>    family inet6 {
>        address 2001:db8::d1c9/64;
>    }
> }
> Interface on my logical-system:
> 
> # show interfaces lt-0/0/10 
> unit 1 {
>    encapsulation frame-relay;
>    dlci 128;
>    peer-unit 0;
>    family inet {
>        address 192.168.209.202/30;
>    }
>    family inet6 {
>        address 2001:db8::d1ca/64;
>    }
> }
> 
> Interface shows 'up' and no flags are set to indicate a problem.  However, 
> pinging doesn't work and this shows up in my logs:
> 
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 tfeb0 HALP-trinity_nh_ucast_installnh(690) encaps-install 
> failed: unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 tfeb0 Failed to create platform state, unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 /kernel: RT_PFE: NH IPC op 1 (ADD NEXTHOP) failed, err 1 
> (Unknown) peer_class 0, peer_index 0 peer_type 17
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 /kernel: RT_PFE: NH details: idx 690 type 2 ifl 80
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 tfeb0 Failed to install in platform, unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 tfeb0 Type specific Add failed unsupported option 
> nh-id:690
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 /kernel: RT_PFE: NH IPC op 2 (CHANGE NEXTHOP) failed, err 
> 1 (Unknown) peer_class 0, peer_index 0 peer_type 17
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 l2cp[1186]: Read acess profile () config
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 /kernel: RT_PFE: NH IPC op 1 (ADD NEXTHOP) failed, err 1 
> (Unknown) peer_class 0, peer_index 0 peer_type 17
> Dec 23 07:57:12  r1 /kernel: RT_PFE: NH details: idx 692 type 2 ifl 81
> Dec 23 07:57:13  r1 tfeb0 HALP-trinity_nh_ucast_installnh(690) encaps-install 
> failed: unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:13  r1 tfeb0 Failed to create platform state, unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:13  r1 tfeb0 Failed to install in platform, unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:13  r1 tfeb0 Type specific Add failed unsupported option 
> nh-id:690
> Dec 23 07:57:13  r1 tfeb0 Failed to instantiate new copy for NH(690)
> Dec 23 07:57:13  r1 tfeb0 Failed to change state
> Dec 23 07:57:13  r1 tfeb0 HALP-trinity_nh_ucast_installnh(692) encaps-install 
> failed: unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:14  r1 tfeb0 Failed to create platform state, unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:14  r1 tfeb0 Failed to install in platform, unsupported option
> Dec 23 07:57:14  r1 tfeb0 Type specific Add failed unsupported option 
> nh-id:692
> 
> Also, this all works if I remove 'family inet6' and change encapsulation to 
> 'ethernet'.
> 
> If frame-relay encapsulation isn't supported, how does one use IPv6 on the 
> lt- interfaces?  
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> evt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to