On Tuesday, December 27, 2011 05:03:06 PM Johannes Resch wrote: > FWIW, we're using NG-MVPN based on mLDP with 11.2 in > production (MX/T). Works well so far,...
Great to hear. Are you using it for real-time Multicast, e.g., IPTv, or non-critical Multicast? Our target is to use mLDP for non-critical, data Multicast services, and leave RSVP for IPTv and such. > but of course > there are caveats, particularly on the HA side - missing > NSR/ISSU support, Is Graceful Restart supported, at least? > missing link-protection etc. Well, LDP has no link-protection capabilities, so not sure how those would come to mLDP. What I know Cisco are doing with their mLDP implementation for now is link-protection, but via RSVP. I haven't tested it, though. > And, > still no NSR/ISSU support for the NG-MVPN BGP AFI :/ > That is not specific to mLDP, though. We're still relying on Graceful Restart for that. > 11.2 releases prior to 11.2R4 have quite a few nasty > NG-MVPN PIM bugs, would recommend to stay away of those. As one would with any pre-R4 release :-). > PS: we have ERs open to cover all the missing HA > NG-MVPN/mLDP points. If anyone else is interested in > those features, drop me a mail. Might be possible to > speed up implementation if more customer demand can be > demonstrated to Juniper.. Yes, we're certainly interested in having those features there. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
