You said this is a ccc interface. Is the customer connecting to this device through this interface or is this part of a L2 circuit that traverses this interface. If it is the latter, they could be running a protocol over the circuit that is being placed in your NC queue. Also, how long did it take to increment? If it only logged 832 packets in a few hours or days I'd ignore it. Reconfiguring qos without understanding the traffic flows may be worse.
2012/1/26 Gökhan Gümüş <ggu...@gmail.com>: > Thanks for the replies. > I do not have any CoS configuration on my router. > There is no Spanning-Tree is running between my device and customer device. > I have no idea what is causing an increment in the network-control queue. > > Any ideas would be appreciated. > > Thanks and regards, > Gokhan > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Keegan Holley <keegan.hol...@sungard.com> > wrote: >> >> Well NC (network control) is a completely different queue than EF >> (expedited forwarding). This could be normal. Several things such as >> routing protocol updates are set to NC by default because it is >> network control traffic or part of the network control plane. Such >> traffic should be prioritized during congestion to keep the paths >> stable. I wouldn't use the NC queue for other traffic if you can >> avoid it and I wouldn't make this traffic best effort without figuring >> out what it is. Is it possible that it's just a control protocol? I >> know most routing protocols mark their hello's as NC. Spanning tree >> BPDU's might do the same but I can't remember off the top of my head. >> >> >> 2012/1/26 Gökhan Gümüş <ggu...@gmail.com>: >> > Dear Saku, >> > >> > Thanks for the reply. >> > >> > I checked the queues on the interface as seen below; >> > >> > LON> show class-of-service interface ge-2/0/4 >> > Physical interface: ge-2/0/4, Index: 158 >> > Queues supported: 8, Queues in use: 4 >> > Scheduler map: <default>, Index: 2 >> > >> > Logical interface: ge-2/0/4.0, Index: 216 >> > >> > How can i use %100 BE by changing my config in Juniper? >> > >> > Thanks and regards, >> > Gokhan >> > _______________________________________________ >> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >> > > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp