10.4R9?  This makes me very happy...  I thought they were going to stop at R8.  
I think they really need/want a golden release for the MX and R8 was supposed 
to be it.

R9 will be good... we hope.
 
Derick Winkworth 
CCIE #15672 (RS, SP), JNCIE-M #721 
http://packetpushers.net/author/dwinkworth/


________________________________
 From: Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org>
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net 
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX
 
Hey Chris.... yeah, that just showed up about 2 weeks ago (at least that's
when I noticed it).

Since JTAC isn't supposed to provide you with recommended releases on
M/T/MX, at least this KB is a reference point... also nice to see them
update the MX recommended release ;)

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Kawchuk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:54 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX

Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release
JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)

http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB21476

- Chris.
... Riding the 10.4 MX Release Train. Next Stop, R9.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to