My environment is unique as I have a financial customer and there should be 0 packet loss. The number of pps at peak times goes up to 80 000 and the spikes are heavy - 10 000 to 80 000 in less than one second. I am asking about stateless NAT because in my case I do not need to do any statefull inspection and doing so only adds additional burden on the device.
Vladislav A. VASILEV 2012/2/4 Timh Bergström <timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com> > We are running a J2320 with NAT/Firewall and serve about 90-150 > clients without breaking a sweat, mind this is an converted SSG320M > with 1G CF / 2GB RAM. In load-tests we can get about 800Mbps through > it, but we don't have any extensive rules. > > -- > Timh Bergström > System Operations > Videoplaza > > timh.bergst...@videoplaza.com > +46 727 406 845 > S:t Eriksgatan 46 > Stockholm > www.videoplaza.com > > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Vladislav A. VASILEV > <vladislavavasi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I was wondering if any of you could give me any real world stats on > > stateless NAT performance (IMIX traffic) on the J2320s. > > > > Since stateless NAT is not possible on the SRX series the cheapest > Juniper > > devices that support it are the J series. I realize they are software > based > > and nowhere close to the performance of the M7i + AS-PIC for example, but > > I'd appreciate if you share any info you may have. > > > > Thank you! > > > > Regards, > > Vladislav A. VASILEV > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp