On 2/16/2012 1:41 PM, Jerry Jones wrote:
I would be careful the hot air exiting the rear is not sucked back in the
front, if the front is higher. Checkout link for airflow description.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/requirements/mx5-mx10-mx40-mx80-cabinet-requirements.html
MX80 air flow is not front->back it is instead side->side (from the
front intake is on right side and exhaust on left).
In the link for the airflow above, keep in mind that that is a front
view and not a side view.
-DMM
On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:29 PM, Serge Vautour wrote:
I don't mean angled side-side, I mean angles front-back. So the back end would
be lower than the front end. After mounting, if you stood in front of the MX,
the front plate would be pointing towards the ceiling a bit instead of
horizontally.
Serge
________________________________
From: Justin M. Streiner<strei...@cluebyfour.org>
To: "juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net"<juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:22:34 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Mounting MX80 at an angle
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Serge Vautour wrote:
Has anyone ever rack mounted an MX80 or a similar sized router at an angle
before? Any reason why this isn't a good idea? Could it have an impact on the
electrical components?
I'm not entirely sure what you mean by mounting at an angle. Do you have any
pictures/examples?
jms
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
